MaraDNS Large Sites?

[blist]

On Monday 01 October 2007, Duane wrote:
> |The second column seems to be memory usage, MaraDNS seems to use the
> |most, any way to improve this to a comparable level of BIND9? Although
> |with ram/hardware prices going down all the time this might not be that
> |much of an issue, unless you are in a virtual hosting situation with 64M
> |of ram or even 128 might start to matter depending how many zones etc
> |your are planning to host.

I looked at those results and then compared it to my local configuration of 
maradns as a recursive server supporting a single machine.  According to KDE 
System Guard, mara is only taking 34 Meg of virtual memory and is noticeably 
less heavy on my systems than bind.

Yes, I realize this may be comparing apples and oranges, but thought I would 
share the data none-the-less.

-- 
mikkl
PCLinuxOS 2007
Registered Linux User #430720