No subject

relative to BIND9, MaraDNS is 134% faster then BIND9, and a lot faster
then BIND9 with LDAP backend, and only marginally second compared to
PowerDNS using a bind style config files.

The second column seems to be memory usage, MaraDNS seems to use the
most, any way to improve this to a comparable level of BIND9? Although
with ram/hardware prices going down all the time this might not be that
much of an issue, unless you are in a virtual hosting situation with 64M
of ram or even 128 might start to matter depending how many zones etc
your are planning to host.

It looks like they used XEN with 256M of memory allocated.

Third column seems to be average CPU usage, MaraDNS appears to be second
only to NSD which doesn't do recursion, so that's not a bad result at all.

I haven't been able to find any other testing on

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane

http://www.freeauth.org - Enterprise Two Factor Authentication
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP

"In the long run the pessimist may be proved right,
    but the optimist has a better time on the trip."