Problem with .fr domains [TEST check if server is really recursive]: answer refused from server (IN/SOA: fr.)

[Markus Ferlitsch]

Now it works :) But only with configure --authonly ; make

Addon: it would be a good idea to be disable/enable the -authonly mode
in the mararc file

So it also would be possible to bind maradns to wan ip without
recursion and bind it to lan port with recursion

then both variantes could run on the same system but for public only
one mode and for internal use it would also work!

Then the --authonly parameter at compiling could be removed. What do
you think about this?

2009/8/4, Markus Ferlitsch <m.ferlitsch at gmail.com>:
> in the normally compiled binary there still seems the bug that when no
> recursion is enabled in mararc file he sets the Recurs available to 1
> instead to 0 (for managed domains) :(
>
> 2009/8/4, Markus Ferlitsch <m.ferlitsch at gmail.com>:
>> Hi, the configure --authonly version works fine
>>
>> But why the nomally compiled version do not work.
>> What is the difference between the authonly and the normal version?
>> The authonly binary is smaller than the other.
>> Why there is not only one version and the authonly configurable via
>> the mararc file? Would this not be better?
>>
>> 2009/8/4, Sam Trenholme <strenholme.usenet at gmail.com>:
>>>  >will try it tomorrow - it's time for bed :)
>>> Sweet dreams...dulces sueños.  :) I too am bilingual, unfortunately my
>>> other
>>> language is Spanish, not French, because they told me Spanish was
>>> easier,
>>> and because, in California, there's a lot more Spanish around with 33%
>>> of
>>> the people there speaking the language
>>>
>>>>Normally it should work, shouldn't?
>>> I hope so.  I want to see this issue resolved so I can close this ticket
>>> and
>>> add a AFNIC FAQ.
>>>
>>> The reason why I'm not going to have it so one can have both recursion
>>> and
>>> giving the correct RA for AFNIC is because the next version won't allow
>>> recursion and authoritative DNS on the same IP, so the less I have to
>>> massage the older soon-to-be-deprecated recursive resolver, the better.
>>>
>>> - Sam
>>>
>>
>